My gut feeling is that this product wasn’t ready to launch, but here it is. Perhaps we’ll see some of these features added in Lightroom CC in the future. In fact, it has a long list of features from Lightroom Classic CC that don’t exist in Lightroom CC (New Coke). This product – Lightroom CC – is NOT what you expect from Lightroom. It’s a cloud-based tool, much like Apple’s Photos and iCloud service. Lightroom CC is for the mobile generation. I tried it and it works, so this is a useful new tool. Put an eyedropper on the area you want to select and it adjusts your mask to match. Then you can choose either a Color or Luminance masking option. The idea is that you still create your mask with the traditional tools – brush, gradient, etc. Excuse me while I contain my enthusiasm.Īnother new feature is Range Masking for selections. Now we’re told that you can move sliders and brushes faster. It makes me miss Aperture for photo management. Yet the obvious truth is that Lightroom is dog-slow for photo management. No doubt those tricks improved some operations. How many times has Adobe promised us that Lightroom got faster? Adobe promised us speed improvements by using the GPU chip and other methods. It has all of the features it had a couple of weeks ago, but now we’re promised it’s faster. With Lightroom CC Classic, you get exactly what you had before – a file based system to use on your local PC or Mac. A pretender wears the Lightroom CC label. The Lightroom CC you knew is now Lightroom Classic CC. So something that you knew as Coke wasn’t really coke. Both were on the market at the same time. People didn’t like that at all, so Coke came back as Coke Classic. It’s sort of like what happened to Coca-Cola years ago.Ĭoke changed its formula to make it sweeter, giving us New Coke. The product you previously knew as Lightroom CC is now Lightroom Classic CC. The only difference is the color of text and the curved border. Now when people use a search engine, what product results will they get? The new product or the old product?īoth have the same name! Even the logos are similar, using the same combination of letters. Over the years, I wrote articles on Lightroom CC. Yes, I’m sure Adobe can explain it, but I look at it from a blogger’s point of view. Assigning the product name to a new product causes confusion among customers. This is just incredibly stupid product management. Now we have Lightroom Classic CC and Lightroom CC. What other reason would a company have for taking one of its most popular products, giving its name to a new product, and then saddling the old product with a “Classic” name? What’s your best option? Lightroom Classic CC vs Lightroom CC – Why Did Adobe Do This to Us? Is there a right choice? The new product has the old name, the old product now sounds like poor marketing, and you may end up paying more for storage. Adobe announced Lightroom Classic CC vs Lightroom CC for 2018.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |